<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <title><![CDATA[Daily Summit Lab]]></title>
  <link>https://daily-summit-lab.com/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[Daily Summit Lab is a London strategy consultancy led by Helen Havelock. Organisational strategy, operating model design, and leadership alignment for complex decisions.]]></description>
  <language>en</language>
  <atom:link href="https://daily-summit-lab.com/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[Operating model design: what it is, what it is not, and when you need it]]></title>
    <link>https://daily-summit-lab.com/notes/operating-model-design-explained.html</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://daily-summit-lab.com/notes/operating-model-design-explained.html</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[An operating model review is one of the most frequently requested engagements at Daily Summit Lab, and one of the most frequently misunderstood. Leaders often arrive with a structural problem framed as a strategic one, or a strategic problem framed as a structural one, and the distinction matters enormously before any redesign work begins. This article sets out what an operating model actually is, where its boundary with strategy sits, and the specific conditions that tell you a redesign is the correct intervention rather than a distraction from a harder conversation. The aim is to give you enough clarity to diagnose your own situation before you commission anything.]]></description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 11:17:53 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[When to bring in an external strategy consultant and when not to]]></title>
    <link>https://daily-summit-lab.com/notes/when-to-hire-external-strategy-consultant.html</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://daily-summit-lab.com/notes/when-to-hire-external-strategy-consultant.html</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[A few years ago we were three weeks into a brand strategy engagement with a mid-sized logistics firm in Lyon when their incoming CEO asked us, plainly, why they had hired us at all. It was a fair question. The internal team already had a clear read on the competitive landscape, a strong point of view on pricing, and a draft positioning document that was more honest than anything we had produced. We finished the engagement, but the most useful thing we delivered was a candid memo recommending they dissolve the brief and trust their own people. That moment has shaped how we take on work ever since. Knowing when to call in external strategic support is a discipline in itself, and most organisations get it wrong in both directions — hiring too early, or waiting so long the window for useful input has closed.]]></description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 07:26:33 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[Generational business transitions: the strategic questions families avoid]]></title>
    <link>https://daily-summit-lab.com/notes/family-business-generational-transition-strategy.html</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://daily-summit-lab.com/notes/family-business-generational-transition-strategy.html</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[What does a family-owned business actually transfer when it moves from one generation to the next? The legal answer involves share registers, directorship changes, and succession deeds. The practical answer is far messier. It involves unspoken assumptions about authority, long-held resentments about who contributed what, and a founder's identity so tangled with the company that separating the two feels like a medical procedure. Families that have built substantial enterprises across twenty or thirty years consistently underestimate how much of that enterprise exists only in informal arrangements, undocumented relationships, and habits of decision-making that nobody ever wrote down. The transition moment does not create these problems. It simply makes them impossible to ignore.]]></description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 18:06:52 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[How to structure a strategy document your board will actually use]]></title>
    <link>https://daily-summit-lab.com/notes/strategy-document-board-will-use.html</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://daily-summit-lab.com/notes/strategy-document-board-will-use.html</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[The most common mistake we see when organisations bring us a strategy document is that it was written for the people who made it, not the people who need to act on it. A board member arrives with forty minutes of preparation time, a folder of competing priorities, and a fiduciary obligation to ask hard questions. When the document they receive is eighty pages of market analysis followed by a vision statement on page seventy-three, they cannot do their job well — and neither can the strategy. The consequences are real: decisions get deferred, the document gets shelved, and the organisation drifts for another quarter. Getting the structure right is not a cosmetic exercise. It is the difference between a strategy that governs behaviour and one that collects dust in a shared drive.]]></description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 17:58:48 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[How to run a rapid strategic diagnostic in two weeks]]></title>
    <link>https://daily-summit-lab.com/notes/rapid-strategic-diagnostic-two-weeks.html</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://daily-summit-lab.com/notes/rapid-strategic-diagnostic-two-weeks.html</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[A two-week strategic diagnostic is not a warm-up to the real work. It is the work, compressed and made precise. Most organisations that commission one already suspect where the problems lie; what they need is a structured method for surfacing the evidence, naming the patterns, and producing a written output that a leadership team can act on without further translation. At Daily Summit Lab, we have run this engagement for manufacturers in the Midwest, regional hospital networks, and mid-size professional services firms, and the structure has stayed remarkably consistent across all of them. What follows is an account of exactly how we do it, including the parts that are less tidy than a methodology slide suggests.]]></description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 06:03:07 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[How to prepare your leadership team for a strategy offsite]]></title>
    <link>https://daily-summit-lab.com/notes/prepare-leadership-team-strategy-offsite.html</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://daily-summit-lab.com/notes/prepare-leadership-team-strategy-offsite.html</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[The most common mistake leadership teams make before a strategy offsite is treating the preparation as logistics: booking the venue, arranging catering, circulating a calendar invite. The actual strategic work, they assume, will happen in the room. It will not. Two days of unstructured conversation among senior leaders without shared context produces something specific and predictable: a long list of priorities, rough consensus on nothing, and a slide deck that someone emails around on the Friday after. Three months later, the organization is operating exactly as it was before. The preparation, not the facilitation, is where the outcome gets decided. What follows is how to do that preparation properly.]]></description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 13:07:33 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
